|
Sr. No.
|
Complaint Number
|
Bench Name
|
Roznama
|
Roznama File
|
Date
|
|
1
|
CC006000000023888
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Ajoy Mehta, Chairperson, MahaRERA
|
pert chart to be provided by R on the progress status, draft RERA compliant AFS to be shared with C
|
NA |
13/06/2018
|
|
2
|
CC006000000056556
|
|
NA
|
NA |
NA
|
|
3
|
CC006000000057306
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Ajoy Mehta, Chairperson, MahaRERA
|
The Matter is Reserved for Order.
|
|
27/09/2021
|
|
4
|
CC006000000057799
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Ajoy Mehta, Chairperson, MahaRERA
|
Parties are at liberty to file Written Submissions by the 28th October 2021. Subsequent to which the matter will be Reserved for Order.
|
|
09/10/2021
|
|
5
|
CC006000000078466
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Ajoy Mehta, Chairperson, MahaRERA
|
Parties have sought time to amicably settle the matter.
|
NA |
15/03/2019
|
|
6
|
CC006000000100196
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Adv. Deepak Pathak for the complainant.
Adv. Sonam Mhatre a/w. Adv. Sana Khan for the respondent.
Respondent is directed to file detailed reply within 4 weeks and copy to the complainant.
Parties to try and settle the matter amicably.
Matter adjourned to 16/12/2019.
|
NA |
05/09/2019
|
|
7
|
CC006000000110917
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Ajoy Mehta, Chairperson, MahaRERA
|
Both parties are at liberty to file written submissions if any by 22nd November, 2021.. Subsequent to the above the matter will be Reserved for
Orders.
|
|
11/11/2021
|
|
8
|
CC006000000120948
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Heard the complainant in person and Adv. Ankur Shah for the respondent a/w Adv. Sana Khan. The respondent to file reply within one week. The matter stands adjourned to 28/01/2020.
|
NA |
13/11/2019
|
|
9
|
CC006000000192734
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. Both the parties have been issued notices for the hearing. Accordingly, both the parties appeared through their respective advocates and made their submissions.
During the hearing both the parties agreed to refer this complaint to MahaRERA Conciliation Forum as they want to avail the possibility of an amicable settlement. Hence the case is referred to concerned Conciliation Bench of MahaRERA for further appropriate action within a period o
|
|
19/10/2020
|
|
10
|
CC006000000192769
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. Both the parties have been issued notices for the hearing. Accordingly, both the parties appeared through their respective advocates and made their submissions.
During the hearing both the parties agreed to refer this complaint to MahaRERA Conciliation Forum as they want to avail the possibility of an amicable settlement. Hence the case is referred to concerned Conciliation Bench of MahaRERA for further appropriate action within a period o
|
|
19/10/2020
|
|
11
|
CC006000000192902
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
AII the parties are present. At the outset, the respondent has pointed out that the IIRF
India Realty VIII Ltd is no longer a party respondent in these complaints and an
application has been filed to that effect on 27-06-2023 reguesting to delete the said
respondent. Accordingly, the said respondent (IIRF India Realty VIII Ltd) is deleted
from the complaints (wherever applicable).
|
|
27/07/2023
|
|
12
|
CC006000000193126
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
AII the parties are present. At the outset, the respondent has pointed out that the IIRF
India Realty VIII Ltd is no longer a party respondent in these complaints and an
application has been filed to that effect on 27-06-2023 reguesting to delete the said
respondent. Accordingly, the said respondent (IIRF India Realty VIII Ltd) is deleted
from the complaints (wherever applicable).
|
|
27/07/2023
|
|
13
|
CC006000000193138
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Both the parties are present.
The matter was kept today for final arguments. The complainant has contended that
the issue of arbitration as per the clause 58 of the agreement for sale has been raised
belatedly by the respondent as this is the second complaint filed by the complainant.
Further, the complainant has also pointed out that this Authority has decided many
complaints on both the issue of arbitration as well as on the reasons for delay
mentioned by the respondent in the matters of
|
|
25/01/2024
|
|
14
|
CC006000000196016
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
AII the parties are present. At the outset, the respondent has pointed out that the IIRF
India Realty VIII Ltd is no longer a party respondent in these complaints and an
application has been filed to that effect on 27-06-2023 reguesting to delete the said
respondent. Accordingly, the said respondent (IIRF India Realty VIII Ltd) is deleted
from the complaints (wherever applicable).
|
|
27/07/2023
|
|
15
|
CC006000000196740
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Both the parties are present.
This complaint is in fact a review application filed by the complainant against the
interim order dated 02-03-2021 passed by the MahaRERA in the earlier complaint
bearing no. CC006000000193126 filed by the complainant herein. However, the said
complaint (CC006000000193126 ) has already been decided by the MahaRERA vide an
order dated 24-11-2023 and refund has also been granted to the complainant.
Therefore, both the parties agree that this review application i
|
|
25/01/2024
|
|
16
|
CC006000000196938
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Ajoy Mehta, Chairperson, MahaRERA
|
The Matter is Reserved for Order.
|
|
27/09/2021
|
|
17
|
CC006000000198190
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
AII the parties are present. At the outset, the respondent has pointed out that the IIRF
India Realty VIII Ltd is no longer a party respondent in these complaints and an
application has been filed to that effect on 27-06-2023 reguesting to delete the said
respondent. Accordingly, the said respondent (IIRF India Realty VIII Ltd) is deleted
from the complaints (wherever applicable).
|
|
27/07/2023
|
|
18
|
CC006000000198947
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Both parties are present (except the respondent - allottee in the complaint at Sr. No. 18
- CC006000000198947).
These complaints are filed by the promoter(complainant) to review the interim order
passed by MahaRERA on 02-03-2021 ( in CC006000000193126 and CC006000000193138
filed by the respondent- allottees) transferring the said complaints to Ld.
Adjudicating Officer, MahaRERA on the issue of refund. However, as the Hon’ble
Supreme Court has decided the issue of jurisdiction of “Authority
|
|
10/03/2023
|
|
19
|
CC006000000198948
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Both parties are present (except the respondent - allottee in the complaint at Sr. No. 18
- CC006000000198947).
These complaints are filed by the promoter(complainant) to review the interim order
passed by MahaRERA on 02-03-2021 ( in CC006000000193126 and CC006000000193138
filed by the respondent- allottees) transferring the said complaints to Ld.
Adjudicating Officer, MahaRERA on the issue of refund. However, as the Hon’ble
Supreme Court has decided the issue of jurisdiction of “Authority
|
|
10/03/2023
|
|
20
|
CC006000000210239
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
The complainant is present. The respondent nos. 1, 4 to 12 are present.
At the outset, the MahaRERA has pointed out to the complainant that the prayers
mentioned in the complaint are of a nature which needs to be agitated by the society /
association of allottees etc., as it is regarding the completion of the project which is a
common issue. Moreover, the prayers of the complainant already seem to have been
partially satisfied as the project is now ongoing. Therefore, all parties agree that
|
NA |
10/03/2023
|
|
21
|
CC006000000220735
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Both the parties are present.
The MahaRERA has pointed out to the applicant-promoter that the present review
application filed against the interim order dated 22-11-2021 passed by the MahaRERA
in Complaint No. CC006000000193126 (filed by the respondent -allottee) transferring
the said complaint (CC006000000193126 ) to Ld. Adjudicating Officer/MahaRERA is
infructuous as the matter is now to be heard by the MahaRERA in view of the order
dated 11-11-2021 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of
|
|
19/05/2023
|
|
22
|
CC006000000220888
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Both the Parties are present.
The Complainant begins by bringing to the notice of this Authority, an order of the Hon'ble
Arbitrator dated 18.06.2022, wherein the sole Arbitrator has held that the issue of the
Promoter would lie within the jurisdiction of RERA. The Respondent brings out the difference between veto powers and the need for affording
a basic protection to the Investor. The veto powers are nothing but reactive in nature only to prevent certain events and occasions that might je
|
|
22/06/2022
|
|
23
|
CC006000000302988
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
AII the parties are present. At the outset, the respondent has pointed out that the IIRF
India Realty VIII Ltd is no longer a party respondent in these complaints and an
application has been filed to that effect on 27-06-2023 reguesting to delete the said
respondent. Accordingly, the said respondent (IIRF India Realty VIII Ltd) is deleted
from the complaints (wherever applicable).
|
|
27/07/2023
|
|
24
|
CC006000000396373
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
The complainant is absent. The respondent is present.
In fact, the complainant was absent in the previous hearing i.e. on 31-07-2023 despite
notice. The complainant is absent again today.
In view of the above, this matter is dismissed for default.
|
|
28/08/2023
|
|
25
|
CC006000000428733
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
Both the parties are present.
The MahaRERA has pointed out to the applicant - promoter that the respondent -
allottee has already filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal vide No.
AT006000000204853 on 08-01-2024 against the impugned order. Therefore, vide
Regulation 36 of MahaRERA General Regulation, 2017 and Section 39 of the RERA,
the MahaRERA cannot proceed with this application for review filed by the compliant
- promoter. Also, the applicant has fi
|
|
12/03/2024
|
|
26
|
CC006000000428734
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
Both the parties are present.
The respondent - allottee is directed to file her reply to the complaint along with written arguments. The applicant - promoter may file a rejoinder along with written arguments.
Accordingly, this complaint / review application is to be fixed for hearing on merits strictly as per seniority for final arguments by both the sides.
|
|
04/06/2024
|
|
27
|
CC006000000428735
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
Both the parties are present.
The MahaRERA has pointed out to the applicant - promoter that the respondent -
allottee has already filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal vide No.
AT006000000204897 on 22-01-2024 against the impugned order. Therefore, as per the
provisions of Regulation 36 of MahaRERA( General) Regulation, 2017 and Section 39
of the RERA, the MahaRERA cannot proceed with this review application filed by the
compliant - promoter.
In view
|
|
12/03/2024
|
|
28
|
CC006000000428736
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
Both the parties are present.
The respondent - allottee has filed his reply to the complaint and the applicant - promoter has filed a rejoinder along with written submissions.
The applicant - promoter is directed to serve the copies of the same on the respondent - allottee. The respondent - allottee may file his written submissions in the complaint.
Accordingly, this complaint / review application is to be fixed for hearing on merits strictly as per seniority for fi
|
|
04/06/2024
|
|
29
|
CC006000000428738
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
Both the parties are present in the complaint at Sr. No. 37 (CC006000000428738). The complainant is present in Sr. No. 42 (CC006000000428793), however, the respondent at Sr. No. 42 is absent.
These complaints are in fact review applications filed against the order of MahaRERA dated 24-11-2023 and 18-08-2023 respectively. The MahaRERA has pointed out that the allottees have already filed appeals before the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal vide No.AT006000000235101 on 10-04-202
|
|
04/06/2024
|
|
30
|
CC006000000428739
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
Both the parties are present.
The respondent - allottee has filed her reply to the complaint and the applicant- promoter has filed its rejoinder cum written submissions and served the copy on the respondent - allottee.
The respondent - allottee is directed to file her written submissions.
Accordingly, this complaint / review application is to be fixed for hearing on merits strictly as per seniority for final arguments by both the sides.
|
|
04/06/2024
|
|
31
|
CC006000000480371
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
“First Hearing Matter”
Both the parties are present.
The complainant desires that this matter be fixed for hearing on merits, although the respondent is ready for conciliation.
Therefore, this matter is to be fixed for hearing on merits strictly as per seniority.
The complainant seeks interim reliefs to direct the respondent not to ask for further payments and not to cancel the allotment. The said interim reliefs are rejected as both the parties are bound to the allotment letter.
|
|
04/06/2024
|