|
Sr. No.
|
Complaint Number
|
Bench Name
|
Roznama
|
Roznama File
|
Date
|
|
1
|
CC006000000079284
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
33
Adv. Mangesh Chawan appeared for the complainant.
Adv. Alvina Castelino appeared for the respondent.
Respondent has filed reply on record of MahaRERA.
Complainant seeks time to file rejoinder.
Matter adjourned to 18/11/2019.
|
NA |
13/09/2019
|
|
2
|
CC006000000079383
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Heard both the parties. Respondent to file reply within two weeks and copy to be given to the complainant. Matter adjourned to 09/09
|
NA |
03/06/2019
|
|
3
|
CC006000000161293
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Adv. Gaurav Patankar appeared for the complainant.
Adv. Alvina Castellino appeared for the respondent.
Complainant to amend the complaint and add the co-promoter to the complaint.
Respondent to file reply in 2 weeks thereafter
Matter adjourned to 20/01/2020.
|
NA |
14/11/2019
|
|
4
|
CC006000000195122
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
Both the parties are present. Heard the parties. The complainant is seeking reliefs under section 13 of the RERA. The respondent seeks time to file reply. Hence, on request of the respondent, one-week time is granted to the respondent to file its reply, after which the final order would be passed. Order is reserved.
|
|
24/01/2022
|
|
5
|
CC006000000197535
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
The complainant is present. The respondent no. 1, 2 and 8 are present. The respondent
no. 3 to 5 are present.
The complainants have argued their matters in the previous hearings pointing out to
the fact that as it was an SRA project, they have paid the amounts in the year 2008
itself and were following up with the respondents for signing of the agreement for
sale. Admittedly, there is no flat number mentioned in the allotment letter and the
area and per sq. ft. rate is visible without any
|
|
28/04/2023
|
|
6
|
CC006000000197544
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
The complainant is present. The respondent no. 1, 2 and 8 are present. The respondent
no. 3 to 5 are present.
The complainants have argued their matters in the previous hearings pointing out to
the fact that as it was an SRA project, they have paid the amounts in the year 2008
itself and were following up with the respondents for signing of the agreement for
sale. Admittedly, there is no flat number mentioned in the allotment letter and the
area and per sq. ft. rate is visible without any
|
|
28/04/2023
|
|
7
|
CC006000000251496
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
The complainant is present. The respondent nos. 1 & 2 are present and the Intervenor is present.
As mentioned in the previous hearing, no amicable settlement has happened so far although the matter was adjourned for the same. Therefore, all the respondents have filed replies to the complaint and the complainant has filed rejoinders to the reply as well as to the Intervenor’s application. The parties may file their written submissions and the respondent may file a reply to the Intervenor’s ap
|
|
26/06/2024
|
|
8
|
CC006000000396848
|
CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA
|
The complainant is present. The respondent no.1 is present.
The complainant has filed this complaint for execution of the agreement for sale or in the alternative for refund of the amount as per the allotment letter of February, 2017. Admittedly, the agreement for sale could not be signed as according to the complainant, the respondent changed certain details mentioned in the draft agreement for sale. The area of the flat was reduced from 1560 sq.t to 578 sq.ft. and a two BHK flat was being a
|
|
26/06/2024
|
|
9
|
CC006000000540742
|
CORAM: MumbaiBench4
|
The parties in the complaint are unable to resolve their disputes, hence the complaint is
referred back to the Authority.
|
|
06/08/2024
|