Project Details

Project Name:
DILKAP GRANDEUR
Promoter Name:
DILIP ESTATE & TOWN PLANNERS PVT LTD
Certificate Download:

Promoter Organization Name:

Sr. No. Name of Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO) Membership Number
1 NA NA
District:
Mumbai City
Registration Date:
14/08/2017
Proposed Date of Completion:
30/06/2025

Extension under Section 6:

Sr. No. From Date: To Date:
1st Extension NA NA

Extension under Section 7 (3):

Sr. No. From Date: To Date:
1st Extension 30/06/2023 30/06/2024
2nd Extension 30/06/2024 30/06/2025

Building Details

Number of Apartment:
42
Number of Booked Apartment:
27
Percentage of Booked Apartment:
64.29

Form 5

Sr. No. Form 5 Document Upload Date View
1 Certificates of CA (Form 5) 02/01/2019
2 Certificates of CA (Form 5) 01/10/2019
3 Annual Audit Report of Statutory CA (Form 5) (FY 2018-19) 08/02/2020
4 Annual Audit Report of Statutory CA (Form 5) (FY 2019-20) 21/10/2020
5 Annual Audit Report of Statutory CA (Form 5) (FY 2020-21) 09/07/2022
6 Annual Audit Report of Statutory CA (Form 5) (FY 2020-21) 11/07/2022
7 Certificates of CA (Form 5) 11/07/2022
8 Annual Audit Report of Statutory CA (Form 5) (FY 2021-22) 24/03/2023
9 Certificates of CA (Form 5) 03/06/2023
10 Annual Audit Report of Statutory CA (Form 5) (FY 2022-23) 10/07/2024
11 Annual Audit Report of Statutory CA (Form 5) (FY 2023-24) 10/07/2024

Percentage of Work:

Sr. No. Building Name Percentage of Work (%)
1 DILKAP GRANDEUR 64.8

Complaint Details:

Sr. No. Complaint Number Date Appeal Filed
1 CC006000000044219 23/04/2018 No
2 CC006000000192175 14/01/2020 No
3 CC006000000192274 24/01/2020 No
4 CC006000000193203 12/05/2020 Yes
5 CC006000000194822 20/11/2020 Yes
6 CC006000000194824 20/11/2020 Yes
7 CC006000000396394 23/06/2023 No
8 CC006000000396395 23/06/2023 No
9 CC006000000397842 14/10/2023 No
Sr. No. Complaint Number Bench Name Roznama Roznama File Date
1 CC006000000044219 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA Adv. Sandeep Manobarwar appeared for the complainant and Adv. Robin Fernandes appeared for the respondent. On hearing the arguments of both the parties, this authority directs the technical officer, MahaRERA to visit the site and submit a report with regards to the percentage of work completed on the site. The matter stands adjourned to 26/6/18 for further hearing. NA 07/06/2018
2 CC006000000192175 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. Both the parties have been issued notices for the hearing. Accordingly, the complainant appeared through their advocates. However, none appeared for the respondent. During the course of hearing, it is informed to the MahaRERA by the complainants that they wish to withdraw these complaints with liberty to file fresh complaints. Accordingly, the have uploaded the withdrawal applications on record of MahaRERA. The same are taken on record an 02/10/2020
3 CC006000000192274 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. Both the parties have been issued notices for the hearing. Accordingly, the complainant appeared through their advocates. However, none appeared for the respondent. During the course of hearing, it is informed to the MahaRERA by the complainants that they wish to withdraw these complaints with liberty to file fresh complaints. Accordingly, the have uploaded the withdrawal applications on record of MahaRERA. The same are taken on record an 02/10/2020
4 CC006000000193203 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA Both the parties are present. Heard the submissions. One-week time is granted to the parties to file their respective written submission along with relevant documents on record of MahaRERA. The final order would be passed after one week based on the submissions made by the parties. Order is reserved. 22/11/2021
5 CC006000000194822 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA Both the parties are Present. Both the parties have ar8ued their matter at length The complainants have contended that the said termination done by the respondent is itlegal and without siSning of the agreement for sale, therc were demands rnade by the resPondent for stage wis€ payments which were illctal The comPlainant Iurther avers d1at, even though the booking and alleged termination as well as the demands are pre-RERA' even as Pe! MOFA they have Paid more than 20% consideration o( the 23/11/2022
6 CC006000000194824 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA Both the parties are Present. Both the parties have ar8ued their matter at length The complainants have contended that the said termination done by the respondent is itlegal and without siSning of the agreement for sale, therc were demands rnade by the resPondent for stage wis€ payments which were illctal The comPlainant Iurther avers d1at, even though the booking and alleged termination as well as the demands are pre-RERA' even as Pe! MOFA they have Paid more than 20% consideration o( the 23/11/2022
7 CC006000000396394 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA “First Hearing Matter” The complainant - promoter is present. The respondent - allottee is absent. This complaint is the review application filed by the applicant - promoter against the order dated 24-02-2023 issued in respect of the complaint bearing no. CCC006000000194824 (filed by the respondent - allottee). Therefore, this complaint / review application is to be fixed for hearing on merits. The complainant - promoter may upload the proof of service on the respondent - allottee. The re 31/07/2023
8 CC006000000396395 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA “First Hearing Matter” The complainant is present. The respondent is absent. This is a review application filed by the complainant - promoter against the order dated 24-02-2023 issued in respect of the complaint no. CC006000000194822 (filed by the respondent-allottee). Therefore, the matter is to be scheduled for hearing on merits strictly as per seniority. The complainant - promoter may upload the proof of service on the respondent - allottee and the respondent - allottee may file her re 18/07/2023
9 CC006000000397842 CORAM: Hon’ble Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Member I, MahaRERA The complainant is present. The respondent is absent. The complainant has mentioned during the hearing that consent terms have not yet been signed between the parties and therefore, this matter may be adjourned to a suitable date to enable the signing of the consent terms although the withdrawal application dated 22-04-2024 has been uploaded in the complaint. The matter is adjourned to a suitable date to enable the signing of the consent terms. 07/05/2024
Sr. No. Complaint Number Interim Order Date
1 CC006000000044219 NA NA
2 CC006000000192175 NA NA
3 CC006000000192274 NA NA
4 CC006000000193203 NA NA
5 CC006000000194822 NA NA
6 CC006000000194824 NA NA
7 CC006000000396394 NA NA
8 CC006000000396395 NA NA
9 CC006000000397842 NA NA
Sr. No. Complaint Number Final Order Date
1 CC006000000044219 12/07/2018
2 CC006000000192175 07/10/2020
3 CC006000000192274 07/10/2020
4 CC006000000193203 28/01/2022
5 CC006000000194822 01/03/2023
6 CC006000000194824 01/03/2023
7 CC006000000396394 NA NA
8 CC006000000396395 NA NA
9 CC006000000397842 NA NA

Non Compliance Details:

Sr. No. Complaint Number Non Compliance Applied Date
1 CC006000000044219 NA
2 CC006000000192175 NA
3 CC006000000192274 NA
4 CC006000000193203 NA
5 CC006000000194822 10/02/2024
6 CC006000000194824 10/02/2024
7 CC006000000396394 NA
8 CC006000000396395 NA
9 CC006000000397842 NA
Sr. No. Complaint Number Non Compliance Roznama Roznama File Date
1 CC006000000044219 NA NA NA
2 CC006000000192175 NA NA NA
3 CC006000000192274 NA NA NA
4 CC006000000193203 NA NA NA
5 CC006000000194822 Adv.Anosh Sequeria alongwith Adv.Sachin Kariya i/b Law Point Firm present for complainant. Adv.Kunal Mehta for respondent present. The learned adv. for complainant submitted that as per clause ‘c’ and ‘d’ it is for the respondent to execute the agreement and it has no relevance with the appeal. It is also submitted by the Ld.Adv. for the complainant that order is to be executed as per order 21 Rule 34 of CPC and also section 37 of the RERA Act. On the other hand adv. for respondent submitte 04/07/2024
6 CC006000000194824 Adv.Anosh Sequeria alongwith Adv.Sachin Kariya i/b Law Point Firm present for complainant. Adv.Kunal Mehta for respondent present. The learned adv. for complainant submitted that as per clause ‘c’ and ‘d’ it is for the respondent to execute the agreement and it has no relevance with the appeal. It is also submitted by the Ld.Adv. for the complainant that order is to be executed as per order 21 Rule 34 of CPC and also section 37 of the RERA Act. On the other hand adv. for respondent submitte 04/07/2024
7 CC006000000396394 NA NA NA
8 CC006000000396395 NA NA NA
9 CC006000000397842 NA NA NA
Sr. No. Complaint Number Non Compliance Interim Order Date
1 CC006000000044219 NA NA
2 CC006000000192175 NA NA
3 CC006000000192274 NA NA
4 CC006000000193203 NA NA
5 CC006000000194822 NA NA
6 CC006000000194824 NA NA
7 CC006000000396394 NA NA
8 CC006000000396395 NA NA
9 CC006000000397842 NA NA
Sr. No. Complaint Number Non Compliance Final Order Date
1 CC006000000044219 NA NA
2 CC006000000192175 NA NA
3 CC006000000192274 NA NA
4 CC006000000193203 NA NA
5 CC006000000194822 25/07/2024
6 CC006000000194824 25/07/2024
7 CC006000000396394 NA NA
8 CC006000000396395 NA NA
9 CC006000000397842 NA NA

For Warrant Issued:

Sr. No. Complaint Number Warrant (Yes/No) Date of Issuance of Warrant District Collector Total Amount of Recovery Warrant Copy of Issued Warrant
1 CC006000000044219 No NA NA NA NA
2 CC006000000192175 No NA NA NA NA
3 CC006000000192274 No NA NA NA NA
4 CC006000000193203 No NA NA NA NA
5 CC006000000194822 No NA NA NA NA
6 CC006000000194824 No NA NA NA NA
7 CC006000000396394 No NA NA NA NA
8 CC006000000396395 No NA NA NA NA
9 CC006000000397842 No NA NA NA NA